from our haikus we went on to develop space allocation diagrams. we met with code experts downtown to understand our restrictions and limitations as far as safety and accessibility in this project. we also considered how the 6 tactics (plane, objects, light, opening, surface, movement) we learned about in integral urbanism apply to each of our spaces and filled out a sort of precedent matrix for each space. we combined these together for a gallery-style critique this past friday and had a few guests attend. sidney and his wife ricky, the building owners, showed up as well as hugh, a local architect, lee, head of downtown, and jerry, another local architect and jo's husband!
the feedback was hugely helpful in this stage of the project. at first, feedback this early didn't seem desirable but after talking to the guests many of us realized that it was actually a great time to have outside opinions come in. this early, we're not as committed to what we're going with and are more able to change and develop our projects. overall, it was a success.
FEEDBACK:
jerry: he really got to the heart of WHY i chose my haiku and how that pours into every single thing that i do (even where i put my light switches). we talked about what resonated with me from the tactics. for me, objects and surfaces stuck out. we discussed multifunctionality and depth of objects and he suggested i think about how that can resonate to my design.
jo: jo was able to help me think about the way that i had things laid out and what was effective versus what wasn't. we decided that i had a little too much lounge space and that i could use some more pharmacy storage and display area. she suggested that i reconsider having my elevator in the middle of the building and also that i refine my drawings.
sidney & rickey: being the building owners and not licensed architects, they mainly listened to what i had to say and seemed excited about the project. i can imagine that it was exciting and a little overwhelming to have so many dreams for their building being presented to them at one time!
katie moyer: in looking over her project she really related her designs to her concept and that stuck out to me.
monica browning: we talked about taking our projects to the next level and really getting to the heart of things.
lee: she mentioned that realty in the downtown area is great and that they want to get people down there! she didn't hate my small apartments and thought the more the merrier as far as residents went. she suggested that i keep the existing elements and what gives the building character, but just update them. she suggested painting the tin ceiling to update it. she also suggested that i make the most of the front window display spaces and take advantage as them as my "money shots".
matt weikert: matt definitely spread his concept all over everything that he did. i thought that it was a great idea to introduce more windows along the washington street side to stir interest.
lauren p: we discussed my huge hallways and she suggested that i take advantage of some as small meeting spaces. we talked over my code issues (and i had a bit) and she made some great suggestions.
hugh: words can't sum up how helpful hugh was to me. he told me to think outward and to really consider the people living there and what they do, their life styles, etc. his energy was contagious and breathed a new life into this project for me.
moving forward, i've got a lot of refining and adjusting to do but i think that this critique was so necessary and helpful.